Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nasrallah v. U.S., 3:15-cv-00538-MOC. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20160510c43 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 06, 2016
Latest Update: May 06, 2016
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on consideration of the Government's motion to disqualify counsel, (Doc. No. 14), and the motion to withdraw filed by Petitioner's court-appointed counsel, Mr. Tomberlin. (Doc. No. 16). In his motion to withdraw, Mr. Tomberlin explains that Mr. Hermann of the New York Bar, who this Court admitted to appear pro hac vice , has made a general appearance on behalf of Petitioner and that Mr. Moors, who is a member in
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on consideration of the Government's motion to disqualify counsel, (Doc. No. 14), and the motion to withdraw filed by Petitioner's court-appointed counsel, Mr. Tomberlin. (Doc. No. 16). In his motion to withdraw, Mr. Tomberlin explains that Mr. Hermann of the New York Bar, who this Court admitted to appear pro hac vice, has made a general appearance on behalf of Petitioner and that Mr. Moors, who is a member in good standing within this District, has entered a notice of appearance as local counsel to Mr. Hermann. (Doc. No. 15). Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that the motion to withdraw should be allowed.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 16).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Government's motion to disqualify is DISMISSED as moot. (Doc. No. 14).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer