DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE

MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the United States of America's Motion, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) and applicable forfeiture law, for entry of Default Judgment and Final Order and Judgment of Forfeiture in this case. [Doc. 34]. For good cause shown, this Court will grant the Motion.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Complaint

On February 9, 2015, the United States filed a verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem [Doc. 1] against the above captioned properties ("Jody Street Properties") and another property ("Holmes Street Property"). The Complaint alleged that the Jody Street Properties and Holmes Street Property constituted proceeds of and facilitated controlled substances offenses, and were therefore subject to forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) and (7). [Id.].

B. Direct Notice and Notice by Publication

Since Vivian Hunt and Harvey Hunt held title to the Jody Street Properties, Vivian Hunt and Veronica Quick appeared to hold an interest in the Holmes Street Property, and Dorothy Hunt was related to Vivian and Harvey, and appeared to reside at the Holmes Street Property, the Government then provided direct notice of the Complaint to Vivian Hunt, Harvey Hunt, Dorothy Hunt, and Veronica Quick. Details of the direct notice are set forth in Exhibit A to the Government's Motion for Default Judgment.

In addition to the above detailed direct notice, the Government provided notice by publication as to all persons in the world with potential claims to the Defendant Property by publishing notice via www.forfeiture.gov from February 24, 2015 through March 25, 2015, as shown on the Submission of Declaration of Publication [Doc. 9] filed on March 26, 2015. Based on the foregoing, process was fully issued and returned according to law.

C. Settlement of Claims

On March 24, 2015, Vivian Hunt, Harvey Hunt, and Veronica Quick filed a verified Claim [Doc. 6]. The case was subsequently stayed, pending a criminal investigation, until September 2016 [Doc. 20]. On October 13, 2016, Vivian Hunt, Harvey Hunt, and Veronica Quick filed their Answers to the Complaint [Docs. 21, 22 & 23].

Following issuance by the Court of a Pretrial Order [Doc. 28] in November 2016, the Government, Vivian Hunt, Harvey Hunt, and Veronica Quick entered into settlement negotiations. As a result of those negotiations and on Motion of the parties, on March 14, 2017, the Court signed and entered the Consent Order for Third Party Petitions [Doc. 30], dismissing the Holmes Street Property from this case and dismissing all claims to the Jody Street Properties.

D. Entry of Default

Based on the foregoing, on March 21, 2017, the Government filed a Motion for Entry of Default [Doc. 32] as to all persons except for Vivian Hunt, Harvey Hunt, and Veronica Quick. On March 21, 2017, the Clerk issued an Entry of Default [Doc. 33].

II. DISCUSSION

The United States has provided direct notice and notice by publication as required by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, Rule G. Other than Vivian Hunt, Harvey Hunt, and Veronica Quick, whose claims have been adjudicated and who have consented to final forfeiture of the Jody Street Properties, no other persons or entities have filed a claim or answer within the time required by the Complaint, the public notice, or the Supplemental Rules. Further, the Clerk has entered default in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Under such circumstances, Rule 55(b)(2) provides for entry of Default Judgment by this Court. Based on the foregoing, the Court concludes that the Government is entitled to a Judgment of Forfeiture by Default and a Final Order and Judgment of Forfeiture against the Defendant Property.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT:

IT IS SO ORDERED.