Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Richardson v. Berryhill, 3:17-CV-108-DCK. (2017)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20171017c19 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2017
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Consent Motion For Remand" (Document No. 15) filed October 16, 2017. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting consent of the parties, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the "Consent Motion For Remand" (Document No
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Consent Motion For Remand" (Document No. 15) filed October 16, 2017. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting consent of the parties, the undersigned will grant the motion.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the "Consent Motion For Remand" (Document No. 15) is GRANTED, and the Court hereby remands this case, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings.

The Clerk of Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer