Filed: Nov. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2017
Summary: AMENDED ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . UPON MOTION of Plaintiff, (Doc. No. 93), for an enlargement of time within which to file a responsive pleading to the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Beddingfield, Lancaster, Lewis, White, and Yearick, and for good cause shown, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED , and Plaintiff shall have sixty days from service of this order in which to file his response. (Doc. No. 93). To this extent, the Court's prior order dated November 17
Summary: AMENDED ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . UPON MOTION of Plaintiff, (Doc. No. 93), for an enlargement of time within which to file a responsive pleading to the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Beddingfield, Lancaster, Lewis, White, and Yearick, and for good cause shown, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED , and Plaintiff shall have sixty days from service of this order in which to file his response. (Doc. No. 93). To this extent, the Court's prior order dated November 17,..
More
AMENDED ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief District Judge.
UPON MOTION of Plaintiff, (Doc. No. 93), for an enlargement of time within which to file a responsive pleading to the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Beddingfield, Lancaster, Lewis, White, and Yearick, and for good cause shown,
Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff shall have sixty days from service of this order in which to file his response. (Doc. No. 93). To this extent, the Court's prior order dated November 17, 2017, (Doc. No. 95), is hereby amended.
No further extensions of time will be granted.
