Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Stoker v. Berryhill, 5:17 CV 111. (2017)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20171213f53 Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . On December 11, 2017, Plaintiff Timothy Stoker filed a Brief in Support of Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, however, did not file a motion with the Court. Regarding motions, Local Civil Rule of Procedure 7.1(A) states: (A) Motions in Writing . Unless made during a hearing or trial, all motions must be put in writing and filed as provide by LCvR 5.2(C) and shall state with particularity the grounds of the motions and shall set forth the relief or
More

ORDER

On December 11, 2017, Plaintiff Timothy Stoker filed a Brief in Support of Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, however, did not file a motion with the Court. Regarding motions, Local Civil Rule of Procedure 7.1(A) states:

(A) Motions in Writing. Unless made during a hearing or trial, all motions must be put in writing and filed as provide by LCvR 5.2(C) and shall state with particularity the grounds of the motions and shall set forth the relief or Order sought. Motions will ordinarily be ruled upon without oral argument, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

Regarding briefs in support of motions, Local Civil Rule of Procedure 7.1(C) states:

(C) Requirement of Briefs. Briefs shall be filed contemporaneously with the motion. . . .

Therefore, the Court DIRECTS Plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment and at that same time file his brief in support.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer