Lewis v. Berryhill, 3:17-CV-350-DCK. (2017)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180102906
Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2017
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Reset Due Dates" (Document No. 21) filed December 28, 2017. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting Plaintiff's counsel has no objection to the motion, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "De
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Reset Due Dates" (Document No. 21) filed December 28, 2017. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting Plaintiff's counsel has no objection to the motion, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Def..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Reset Due Dates" (Document No. 21) filed December 28, 2017. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting Plaintiff's counsel has no objection to the motion, the undersigned will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Reset Due Dates" (Document No. 21) is GRANTED. Defendant shall have up to and including February 5, 2018 to file a Motion for Summary Judgment and supporting Memorandum.
Source: Leagle
