Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

USA v. Cureton, 3:14-cr-229. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20180116b61 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's Motion to Seal. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court has considered the Motion to Seal, the public's interest in access to such materials, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that no less restrictive means other than sealing is sufficient inasmuch as public filing of such sentencing materials could either reveal protected information under HIPPA or the E-Government Act or enda
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's Motion to Seal. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court has considered the Motion to Seal, the public's interest in access to such materials, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that no less restrictive means other than sealing is sufficient inasmuch as public filing of such sentencing materials could either reveal protected information under HIPPA or the E-Government Act or endanger the physical wellbeing of a person who has provided a supporting letter. The Court will, however, consider any request made in the future to unseal such materials. Having considered defendant's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the Court enters the following Order.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Seal (#780) is GRANTED. The Letters of Recommendation Regarding Sentencing (#774) and Sentencing Memorandum (#779) shall be sealed and remain sealed until further Order of this court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer