Hensley v. Price, 1:14-cv-00193-MR-DLH. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180221j79
Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants' Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending the Petition for Cert to the United States Supreme Court [Doc. 69]. For the reasons stated by the Defendants and for cause shown, the Court will grant the Defendants' motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Stay [Doc. 69] is GRANTED , and this case is hereby STAYED pending the United States Supreme Court's ruling on the Defenda
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants' Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending the Petition for Cert to the United States Supreme Court [Doc. 69]. For the reasons stated by the Defendants and for cause shown, the Court will grant the Defendants' motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Stay [Doc. 69] is GRANTED , and this case is hereby STAYED pending the United States Supreme Court's ruling on the Defendan..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants' Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending the Petition for Cert to the United States Supreme Court [Doc. 69].
For the reasons stated by the Defendants and for cause shown, the Court will grant the Defendants' motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Stay [Doc. 69] is GRANTED, and this case is hereby STAYED pending the United States Supreme Court's ruling on the Defendants' petition for writ of certiorari. The parties shall notify the Court within fourteen (14) days of the Supreme Court's action on the Defendants' petition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
