Indratech, LLC v. Fibrix, LLC, 5:16-CV-179-DCK. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180227a94
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Consent Motion For Protection From Court Appearance" (Document No. 46) filed February 23, 2018. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), and immediate review of this motion is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting consent of Plaintiff's counsel, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Consent Motion For Protection From Court Appearance" (Document No. 46) filed February 23, 2018. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), and immediate review of this motion is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting consent of Plaintiff's counsel, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that t..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Consent Motion For Protection From Court Appearance" (Document No. 46) filed February 23, 2018. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and immediate review of this motion is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting consent of Plaintiff's counsel, the undersigned will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the "Consent Motion For Protection From Court Appearance" (Document No. 46) is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
