Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Casner, 3:17-cr-00074-MOC-DSC. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20180302c67 Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's consent Motion to Amend Judgment by Consent. For cause, defendant shows that the sum imposed as Restitution for the two victim banks was recovered in full by law enforcement. Inasmuch as both the government and the defendant have consented to the proposed amendment, the Court is now assured that such funds will or have been returned to the victims and that no claims to seized funds or administrative
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's consent Motion to Amend Judgment by Consent. For cause, defendant shows that the sum imposed as Restitution for the two victim banks was recovered in full by law enforcement. Inasmuch as both the government and the defendant have consented to the proposed amendment, the Court is now assured that such funds will or have been returned to the victims and that no claims to seized funds or administrative process stands in the way of such return. Having considered defendant's consent motion and reviewed the pleadings, the Court enters the following Order.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's consent Motion to Amend Judgment by Consent (#32) is GRANTED, and the Clerk of Court is instructed to submit to chambers an Amended Judgment without a restitution provision.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer