U.S. v. El, 3:16-cr-00166-MOC-DSC. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180319815
Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's Motion to Suppress and Motion to Withdraw Motion. For cause, defendant shows that the government has responded to the Motion to Suppress and therein indicated that it "does not intend to introduce into evidence, in its case-in-chief, the statements or recordings referenced in the Defendant's Motion to Suppress." Defendant states that such renders its motion moot and that a hearing is no longer neede
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's Motion to Suppress and Motion to Withdraw Motion. For cause, defendant shows that the government has responded to the Motion to Suppress and therein indicated that it "does not intend to introduce into evidence, in its case-in-chief, the statements or recordings referenced in the Defendant's Motion to Suppress." Defendant states that such renders its motion moot and that a hearing is no longer needed..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's Motion to Suppress and Motion to Withdraw Motion. For cause, defendant shows that the government has responded to the Motion to Suppress and therein indicated that it "does not intend to introduce into evidence, in its case-in-chief, the statements or recordings referenced in the Defendant's Motion to Suppress." Defendant states that such renders its motion moot and that a hearing is no longer needed. The Court concurs. Having considered defendant's motions and reviewed the pleadings, the Court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Withdraw Motion (#49) is GRANTED, the Motion to Suppress (#45) is TERMINATED as moot, and the March 19, `, evidentiary hearing is CANCELLED.
Source: Leagle
