Buchanan v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-191-GCM. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180329e13
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2018
Summary: CONSENT ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $3,500.00 in full and final settlem
Summary: CONSENT ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $3,500.00 in full and final settleme..
More
CONSENT ORDER
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $3,500.00 in full and final settlement of all claims for attorney fees arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the sum of $3,500.00, sent to Plaintiff's counsel's office address, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
