ORDER

FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Post-Judgment Discovery against WDS, Inc. (Doc. No. 367). WDS filed a response to the Motion as ordered by the Court, and the Court held a hearing on the Motion and other pending motions on April 11, 2018.

Based on the parties' filings and their representations at the hearing, the Court concludes WDS did not timely respond to Plaintiffs' First Set of Post Judgment Interrogatories or First Set of Post Judgment Requests for Production of Documents; WDS has, as of April 9, 2018, provided responses and some production; but the responses and production are not complete. Therefore, a Court order requiring responses and production may still be necessary.1 Accordingly, as agreed to at the hearing, counsel for Plaintiffs and WDS will meet and confer and tender a proposed order for the Court's consideration through Cyberclerk. The proposed order shall set forth a deadline for complete responses and production. To the extent the parties consent to the Court imposing further relief in its order, such as those addressed in Plaintiffs' Motion, in WDS's response brief, and at the hearing, the proposed order may include this relief.2 The proposed order may also indicate the parties' disagreement on matters currently before the Court.

THEREFORE, the Court hereby ORDERS counsel for Plaintiffs and WDS, Inc. to meet and confer and tender a proposed order to the Court through Cyberclerk no later than April 20, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.