U.S. v. Farris, 3:18-cr-99. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180504a11
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's pro se Motion for Jail Law Library Access. After consulting the record, it appears defendant is represented by counsel. As the Local Criminal Rules prohibit pro se pleadings where defendant is represented by counsel, LCrR 47.1(g), the court will deny defendant's motion and encourage him to instead consult with counsel. Having considered defendant's motions, the Court enters the following Order.
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's pro se Motion for Jail Law Library Access. After consulting the record, it appears defendant is represented by counsel. As the Local Criminal Rules prohibit pro se pleadings where defendant is represented by counsel, LCrR 47.1(g), the court will deny defendant's motion and encourage him to instead consult with counsel. Having considered defendant's motions, the Court enters the following Order. ..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's pro se Motion for Jail Law Library Access. After consulting the record, it appears defendant is represented by counsel. As the Local Criminal Rules prohibit pro se pleadings where defendant is represented by counsel, LCrR 47.1(g), the court will deny defendant's motion and encourage him to instead consult with counsel. Having considered defendant's motions, the Court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's pro se Motion for Jail Law Library Access (#14) is DENIED. Defendant is encouraged to consult with counsel before making any further filings in this matter.
Source: Leagle
