Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Honeycutt v. Berryhill, 5:17-cv-000140-MR. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20180622c99 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Consent Motion for Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(1)(A) and Costs [Doc. 17]. The Plaintiff moves the Court for an award of $4,750.00 in full satisfaction of any and all claims for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) ("EAJA"). [Doc. 17]. The Commissioner consents to the Plaintiff's Motion. [ Id. ]. In light of the C
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Consent Motion for Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) and Costs [Doc. 17].

The Plaintiff moves the Court for an award of $4,750.00 in full satisfaction of any and all claims for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) ("EAJA"). [Doc. 17]. The Commissioner consents to the Plaintiff's Motion. [Id.]. In light of the Court's prior remand of this matter, and in the absence of any contention by the Commissioner that her position was substantially justified or that special circumstances exist that would render an award of attorney's fees unjust, the Court concludes that the Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney's fees under the EAJA. The Court further concludes that, in light of the Commissioner's lack of opposition to the Plaintiff's request, the Plaintiff is entitled to reimbursement from the Treasury Judgment Fund of the $420.01 in costs incurred as a result of filing and prosecuting this action.

The Plaintiff requests that the EAJA award be paid directly to Plaintiff's counsel as his assignee. In support of this request, the Plaintiff has submitted a copy of his Assignment of EAJA Fees to counsel. [Doc. 17-1]. The Court finds that the Commissioner should accept this assignment of the awarded fees by the Plaintiff to his attorney and upon receipt of such assignment, the Commissioner will pay that award of fees directly to Plaintiff's counsel, provided that it is shown that as of the date of this Order, the Plaintiff does not owe any debt to the United States Government which is subject to offset. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 589 (2010).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion [Doc. 17] is hereby GRANTED, and the Plaintiff is hereby awarded attorney's fees in the amount of Four Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($4,750.00), which sum is in full satisfaction of any and all claims by the Plaintiff in this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner shall inform Plaintiff's counsel whether the Plaintiff owes a debt to the Government by which this fee award may be offset no later than thirty (30) days from entry of this Order. Within the same time period, the Plaintiff shall provide a valid fee assignment to the Defendant.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Four Hundred Twenty Dollars and One Cent ($420.01) in costs shall be reimbursed to the Plaintiff from the Treasury Judgment Fund upon certification thereof by the Office of the United States Attorney to the Department of Treasury.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in the event that past-due benefits are awarded on remand, the Plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days after being served with notice of the past-due benefits award to file for an award of fees pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no additional motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) may be filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer