Filed: Jul. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the defendant's pro se motion for the return of a cellphone seized from him, (Doc. No. 83), and the government's notice of intent to return it, (Doc. No. 90). The government proposes to turn the cellphone over to appointed counsel, ( id. at 2), and neither the defendant nor counsel has objected to that plan. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant's motion, (Doc. No. 83), is GRANTED , and the gover
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the defendant's pro se motion for the return of a cellphone seized from him, (Doc. No. 83), and the government's notice of intent to return it, (Doc. No. 90). The government proposes to turn the cellphone over to appointed counsel, ( id. at 2), and neither the defendant nor counsel has objected to that plan. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant's motion, (Doc. No. 83), is GRANTED , and the govern..
More
ORDER
ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the defendant's pro se motion for the return of a cellphone seized from him, (Doc. No. 83), and the government's notice of intent to return it, (Doc. No. 90).
The government proposes to turn the cellphone over to appointed counsel, (id. at 2), and neither the defendant nor counsel has objected to that plan.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant's motion, (Doc. No. 83), is GRANTED, and the government may convey the cellphone to counsel of record for delivery to the defendant's designee.
