Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Stencil, 3:16-cr-00221-MOC-DCK. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20180927b51 Visitors: 22
Filed: Sep. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the government's Motion for [Second] Status Conference. So that such conference may be an effective use of time, any motions to sever, motions to continue, or updates on the status or health of any defendant or witness should be filed in advance of such conference date. Having considered the government's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the Court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the government's Motion for [Second] Status Conference. So that such conference may be an effective use of time, any motions to sever, motions to continue, or updates on the status or health of any defendant or witness should be filed in advance of such conference date. Having considered the government's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the Court enters the following Order.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the government's Motion for [Second] Status Conference (#280) is GRANTED, and an in-person and in-court Status Conference is calendared for 2 p.m. on Monday, October 15, 2018. While a status conference is generally not a substantive proceeding, if any in-custody defendant desires to be present for that conference, counsel should notify the Clerk of Court so that arrangements can be made with the United States Marshal.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer