Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. v. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 3:18-cv-00507-GCM. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20181015646
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING APPELLANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL GRAHAM C. MULLEN , Senior District Judge . The Court has considered Appellants' Unopposed Motion for Stay Pending Appeal [D.I. 4] and the accompanying exhibits and finds that good cause exists to grant the motion, and that the requirements for a stay pending appeal are satisfied. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Appellants' Unopposed Motion for Stay Pending Appeal [D.I. 4] is GRANTED. 2. The Order Confirming that Auto
Summary: ORDER GRANTING APPELLANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL GRAHAM C. MULLEN , Senior District Judge . The Court has considered Appellants' Unopposed Motion for Stay Pending Appeal [D.I. 4] and the accompanying exhibits and finds that good cause exists to grant the motion, and that the requirements for a stay pending appeal are satisfied. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Appellants' Unopposed Motion for Stay Pending Appeal [D.I. 4] is GRANTED. 2. The Order Confirming that Autom..
More
ORDER GRANTING APPELLANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, Senior District Judge.
The Court has considered Appellants' Unopposed Motion for Stay Pending Appeal [D.I. 4] and the accompanying exhibits and finds that good cause exists to grant the motion, and that the requirements for a stay pending appeal are satisfied.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Appellants' Unopposed Motion for Stay Pending Appeal [D.I. 4] is GRANTED.
2. The Order Confirming that Automatic Stay Does Not Apply to Applications for Entry of Consent Judgments, entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina on September 6, 2018 (Bankruptcy Court D.I. 1140), and the effect of the Order, are hereby STAYED for the duration of this appeal in the United States District Court.
3.The stay shall continue until fourteen (14) days following (1) the entry of this Court's judgment or (2) this Court's entry of an order disposing of all motions for rehearing (to the extent any such motions are filed) of its judgment in this matter, whichever is later. Nothing in this Order will preclude any party from seeking a further stay upon the expiration of the stay granted herein.
4. The Court does not require bond or other security for the stay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
