U.S. v. Dixon, 5:17-CR-055-RLV-DCK. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20181105f66
Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendant's "Motion To Seal" (Document No. 33) filed November 1, `. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court has considered the Motion to Continue Trial Date, the public's interest in access to the materials in question, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that no less restrictive means other than sealing is sufficient inasmuch as the Motion To Continue Trial Date contains sensitive and privat
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendant's "Motion To Seal" (Document No. 33) filed November 1, `. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court has considered the Motion to Continue Trial Date, the public's interest in access to the materials in question, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that no less restrictive means other than sealing is sufficient inasmuch as the Motion To Continue Trial Date contains sensitive and private..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendant's "Motion To Seal" (Document No. 33) filed November 1, `. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court has considered the Motion to Continue Trial Date, the public's interest in access to the materials in question, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that no less restrictive means other than sealing is sufficient inasmuch as the Motion To Continue Trial Date contains sensitive and private information that is inappropriate for public access. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and for good cause, the undersigned will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant's "Motion To Seal" (Document No. 33) is GRANTED, and Defendant's "Unopposed Motion To Continue Trial Date" (Document No. 32) is sealed until further Order of this Court.
Source: Leagle
