Hall v. Pruitt, 1:18-cv-44-FDW. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20181128e21
Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion, Nunc Pro Tunc , of Defendant Kalinowski for an Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, (Doc. No. 20), and Defendants Teresa Puett, George Bright, and Robert Kalinowski's Motion of Defendants for an Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint ( Nunc Pro Tunc ), (Doc. No. 21). The Court finds that Answers were not timely filed d
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion, Nunc Pro Tunc , of Defendant Kalinowski for an Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, (Doc. No. 20), and Defendants Teresa Puett, George Bright, and Robert Kalinowski's Motion of Defendants for an Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint ( Nunc Pro Tunc ), (Doc. No. 21). The Court finds that Answers were not timely filed du..
More
ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion, Nunc Pro Tunc, of Defendant Kalinowski for an Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, (Doc. No. 20), and Defendants Teresa Puett, George Bright, and Robert Kalinowski's Motion of Defendants for an Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Nunc Pro Tunc), (Doc. No. 21). The Court finds that Answers were not timely filed due to excusable neglect and an extension of time will not prejudice Plaintiff. For good cause shown,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that
1. Defendant Kalinowski's Motion, Nunc Pro Tunc, of Defendant Kalinowski for an Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, (Doc. No. 20), is GRANTED until December 11, 2018.
2. Defendants Teresa Puett, George Bright, and Robert Kalinowski's Motion of Defendants for an Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Nunc Pro Tunc), (Doc. No. 21) is GRANTED until December 26, 2018.
3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is instructed to substitute the parties' names as follows:
Robert L. Kalinowski for "FNU Kalinowski"
George R. Bright for "FNU Brigth"
Teresa Puett for "FNU Pruitt"
Source: Leagle
