Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Haney v. Berryhill, 1:17-CV-070-DCK. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20181219d48 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Plaintiff's Consent Motion For Attorney Fees Under The Equal Access To Justice Act 28 U.S.C. 2412" (Document No. 30) filed December 14, 2018. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting consent of the parties, the undersigned will grant the motion. The undersi
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Plaintiff's Consent Motion For Attorney Fees Under The Equal Access To Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412" (Document No. 30) filed December 14, 2018. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and noting consent of the parties, the undersigned will grant the motion.

The undersigned notes that the parties agree that the amount of Six Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($6,100.00) should be paid to Plaintiff in full satisfaction of any and all claims for fees in this case.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Plaintiff's Consent Motion For Attorney Fees Under The Equal Access To Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412" (Document No. 30) is GRANTED, and an award of fees under the EAJA in the amount of $6,100.00 be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney, provided that the Department of the Treasury finds Plaintiff has no outstanding debt.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer