U.S. v. Hellman, 3:18-mj-340-DCK. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190118a07
Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the pro se "Affidavit Of Mark Eliot Hellman; Motion For Return Of Personal Property; Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 17) filed December 18, 2018. The undersigned notes that, according to the docket, Defendant is represented by CJA appointed counsel, Richard Eugene Beam, Jr. It is the practice of the Court that when a Defendant is represented by counsel, all motions should be filed through counsel of record.
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the pro se "Affidavit Of Mark Eliot Hellman; Motion For Return Of Personal Property; Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 17) filed December 18, 2018. The undersigned notes that, according to the docket, Defendant is represented by CJA appointed counsel, Richard Eugene Beam, Jr. It is the practice of the Court that when a Defendant is represented by counsel, all motions should be filed through counsel of record. ..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the pro se "Affidavit Of Mark Eliot Hellman; Motion For Return Of Personal Property; Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 17) filed December 18, 2018. The undersigned notes that, according to the docket, Defendant is represented by CJA appointed counsel, Richard Eugene Beam, Jr. It is the practice of the Court that when a Defendant is represented by counsel, all motions should be filed through counsel of record.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the pro se "Affidavit Of Mark Eliot Hellman; Motion For Return Of Personal Property; Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 17) is hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant may re-file his motion, if desired, through his counsel, Richard Eugene Beam, Jr.
Source: Leagle
