Jackson v. U.S., 1:06-cr-00252-MR-2. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190220b91
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the motion of the United States requesting that the Court continue holding this action in abeyance, pending a decision by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Davis , No. 18-431 (cert. granted Jan. 4, 2019). [Doc. 10]. According to the Government's motion, defense counsel does not object to its request. [ Id. ]. Based upon the reasons given by the Government, and without objection by Petitioner,
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the motion of the United States requesting that the Court continue holding this action in abeyance, pending a decision by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Davis , No. 18-431 (cert. granted Jan. 4, 2019). [Doc. 10]. According to the Government's motion, defense counsel does not object to its request. [ Id. ]. Based upon the reasons given by the Government, and without objection by Petitioner, t..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the motion of the United States requesting that the Court continue holding this action in abeyance, pending a decision by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Davis, No. 18-431 (cert. granted Jan. 4, 2019). [Doc. 10]. According to the Government's motion, defense counsel does not object to its request. [Id.].
Based upon the reasons given by the Government, and without objection by Petitioner, the Court concludes that the Government's motion should be granted.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Government's motion to continue holding this case in abeyance [Doc. 10] is hereby GRANTED and this matter is hereby held in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Davis, No. 18-431 (cert. granted Jan. 4, 2019). Thereafter, the Government shall have 60 days from the date that the Supreme Court issues its decision in Davis within which to file its response in this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
