Eric Plant, LLC v. Whittaker, 3:18-cv-00574-MOC-DSC. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190314c10
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on plaintiffs' Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Order, which denied plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend, and on defendants' Motion to Dismiss. After de novo review and a hearing, the Court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiffs' Objection to Magistrate Judge's Decision (#21) is SUSTAINED , plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend (#15) is GRANTED , and defendants' Moti
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on plaintiffs' Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Order, which denied plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend, and on defendants' Motion to Dismiss. After de novo review and a hearing, the Court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiffs' Objection to Magistrate Judge's Decision (#21) is SUSTAINED , plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend (#15) is GRANTED , and defendants' Motio..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on plaintiffs' Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Order, which denied plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend, and on defendants' Motion to Dismiss. After de novo review and a hearing, the Court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiffs' Objection to Magistrate Judge's Decision (#21) is SUSTAINED, plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend (#15) is GRANTED, and defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#2) is DENIED without prejudice as moot. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file an Amended Complaint within 7 days of this Order. Defendants shall have 14 days to Answer or otherwise respond to that pleading.
Source: Leagle
