Snipes v. Berryhill, 3:18-CV-00484-FDW. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190612c43
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Consent Motion to Remand this case to the Social Security Administration. (Doc. No. 15). Noting consent of the parties, the Motion is GRANTED, the Commissioner's decision in this case is REVERSED and this matter will be REMANDED for a new hearing pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. Sentence Four authorizes "a judgment affirming, modifying, or rev
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Consent Motion to Remand this case to the Social Security Administration. (Doc. No. 15). Noting consent of the parties, the Motion is GRANTED, the Commissioner's decision in this case is REVERSED and this matter will be REMANDED for a new hearing pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. Sentence Four authorizes "a judgment affirming, modifying, or reve..
More
ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Consent Motion to Remand this case to the Social Security Administration. (Doc. No. 15). Noting consent of the parties, the Motion is GRANTED, the Commissioner's decision in this case is REVERSED and this matter will be REMANDED for a new hearing pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Sentence Four authorizes "a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision . . . with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing." Sullivan v. Finkelstein, 496 U.S. 617, 625 (1990).
Source: Leagle
