Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Winstead v. Saul, 3:19-cv-184-RJC. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20190807b42 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Change Venue, (Doc. No. 7). Jurisdiction to review any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is governed by 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Phillips v. Soc. Sec. Admin. , 537 F. App'x 268, 269 (4th Cir. 2013) (unpublished). Section 405(g) provides that a civil action shall be brought in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff re
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Change Venue, (Doc. No. 7).

Jurisdiction to review any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is governed by 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Phillips v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 537 F. App'x 268, 269 (4th Cir. 2013) (unpublished). Section 405(g) provides that a civil action

shall be brought in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides, or has his principal place of business, or, if he does not reside or have his principal place of business within any such judicial district, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff indicated that he resides in the city of Concord and the county of Cabarrus. (Doc. No. 1). Cabarrus County is one of the counties in the Middle District of North Carolina. Therefore, venue is not proper in the Western District of North Carolina. "The district court of a district in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).

Upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue, (Doc. No. 7), the Motion is GRANTED, and the Court hereby transfers this case to the Middle District of North Carolina and strikes this case from the docket of the Western District of North Carolina.

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Andrew Saul became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on June 17, 2019. Under Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew Saul should be substituted for Nancy A. Berryhill as the defendant in this suit. No further action is necessary under section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer