Dudley-Haines v. Saul, 3:19-00074-DSC. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190904898
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing Defendant's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and in light of Defendant's Motion, with Plaintiff's consent, to remand this action for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby remands this case to Defendant, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), for further administrative proceedin
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing Defendant's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and in light of Defendant's Motion, with Plaintiff's consent, to remand this action for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby remands this case to Defendant, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), for further administrative proceeding..
More
ORDER
DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing Defendant's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of Defendant's Motion, with Plaintiff's consent, to remand this action for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby remands this case to Defendant, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
The Clerk will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
