United States v. Johnson, 3:15-CR-158-MOC-DSC-1. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190924c26
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's pro se Motion for Early Termination of Probation/Supervised Release. Defendant's motion fails to reflect whether defendant's supervising officer concurs in the request. The Court will deny the current request at this time, but the Court will closely consider any future request if it is accompanied by favorable recommendations from defendant's supervising officer. Having considered defendant's pro se
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's pro se Motion for Early Termination of Probation/Supervised Release. Defendant's motion fails to reflect whether defendant's supervising officer concurs in the request. The Court will deny the current request at this time, but the Court will closely consider any future request if it is accompanied by favorable recommendations from defendant's supervising officer. Having considered defendant's pro se ..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's pro se Motion for Early Termination of Probation/Supervised Release. Defendant's motion fails to reflect whether defendant's supervising officer concurs in the request. The Court will deny the current request at this time, but the Court will closely consider any future request if it is accompanied by favorable recommendations from defendant's supervising officer. Having considered defendant's pro se motion and reviewed the pleadings, the Court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's pro se Motion for Early Termination of Probation/Supervised Release (#69) is DENIED without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
