United States v. Martin, 1:19-CR-00048-MOC-WCM-1. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20191008j44
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence and Incorporated Memorandum of Law. (Doc. No. 10). The Government has responded, opposing the motion. (Doc. No. 13). The Court will hear argument on the motion on October 2, 2019. In preparation, the Court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the parties shall be prepared to discuss United States v. Clyburn , 24 F.3d 613 (4th Cir. 1994),
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence and Incorporated Memorandum of Law. (Doc. No. 10). The Government has responded, opposing the motion. (Doc. No. 13). The Court will hear argument on the motion on October 2, 2019. In preparation, the Court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the parties shall be prepared to discuss United States v. Clyburn , 24 F.3d 613 (4th Cir. 1994), a..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence and Incorporated Memorandum of Law. (Doc. No. 10). The Government has responded, opposing the motion. (Doc. No. 13). The Court will hear argument on the motion on October 2, 2019. In preparation, the Court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the parties shall be prepared to discuss United States v. Clyburn, 24 F.3d 613 (4th Cir. 1994), and United States v. Lull, 824 F.3d 109 (4th Cir. 2016), explaining whether and to what extent these cases clarify whether the Magistrate had a substantial basis for finding probable cause to issue a search warrant.
Source: Leagle
