Herrera v. Saul, 3:19-00168-FDW. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20191112d01
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Consent Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 14). For the reasons stated in the consent motion, it is GRANTED. In light of this motion, Plaintiff's pending Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED AS MOOT. Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing Defendant's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Consent Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 14). For the reasons stated in the consent motion, it is GRANTED. In light of this motion, Plaintiff's pending Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED AS MOOT. Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing Defendant's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g)..
More
ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Consent Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 14). For the reasons stated in the consent motion, it is GRANTED. In light of this motion, Plaintiff's pending Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED AS MOOT.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing Defendant's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of Defendant's motion, with Plaintiff's consent, to remand this action for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby remands this case to Defendant, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
The clerk of the Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and CLOSE THE CASE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
