United States v. Ervin, 3:19-CR-091-FDW-DCK. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20191119b11
Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Defendant's "Motion To Seal" (Document No. 29) filed November 14, 2019. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court has considered the Motion to Seal, the public's interest in access to the affected materials, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that no less restrictive means other than sealing is sufficient inasmuch as Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Docket Call/Trial Date contains
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Defendant's "Motion To Seal" (Document No. 29) filed November 14, 2019. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court has considered the Motion to Seal, the public's interest in access to the affected materials, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that no less restrictive means other than sealing is sufficient inasmuch as Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Docket Call/Trial Date contains s..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Defendant's "Motion To Seal" (Document No. 29) filed November 14, 2019. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court has considered the Motion to Seal, the public's interest in access to the affected materials, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that no less restrictive means other than sealing is sufficient inasmuch as Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Docket Call/Trial Date contains sensitive and private information that is inappropriate for public access. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and for good cause, the undersigned will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant's "Motion To Seal" (Document No. 29) is GRANTED, and the Unopposed Motion to Continue Sentencing (Document No. 30) is sealed until further Order of this Court.
Source: Leagle
