Johnson v. Mind Your Business, Inc., 1:19-CV-00131-MOC-WCM. (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20200108a53
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2020
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Counsel's Motion for Leave to Attend Hearing on Motion for Settlement Enforcement by Telephone (#33). Having considered the matter, the Court enters the following Order. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Counsel's Motion for Leave to Attend Hearing on Motion for Settlement Enforcement by Telephone (#33) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Counsel is hereby granted leave to appear by telephone
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Counsel's Motion for Leave to Attend Hearing on Motion for Settlement Enforcement by Telephone (#33). Having considered the matter, the Court enters the following Order. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Counsel's Motion for Leave to Attend Hearing on Motion for Settlement Enforcement by Telephone (#33) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Counsel is hereby granted leave to appear by telephone a..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Counsel's Motion for Leave to Attend Hearing on Motion for Settlement Enforcement by Telephone (#33). Having considered the matter, the Court enters the following Order.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Counsel's Motion for Leave to Attend Hearing on Motion for Settlement Enforcement by Telephone (#33) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Counsel is hereby granted leave to appear by telephone at the hearing set for January 9, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. in the above-captioned matter.
Source: Leagle
