Harper ex rel. Harper v. Saul, 1:19-cv-00212-FDW. (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20200123c52
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 22, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2020
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Consent Motion to Remand, submitted by Defendant Commissioner (Doc. No. 14). Also before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 13). Upon review of the Consent Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 14), Plaintiff's consent to that motion, and the entire record in this case, and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), IT IS ORDERED that the Consent Motion (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED, the final decision
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Consent Motion to Remand, submitted by Defendant Commissioner (Doc. No. 14). Also before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 13). Upon review of the Consent Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 14), Plaintiff's consent to that motion, and the entire record in this case, and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), IT IS ORDERED that the Consent Motion (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED, the final decision o..
More
ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Consent Motion to Remand, submitted by Defendant Commissioner (Doc. No. 14). Also before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 13).
Upon review of the Consent Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 14), Plaintiff's consent to that motion, and the entire record in this case, and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), IT IS ORDERED that the Consent Motion (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED, the final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and the matter is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.
Because the Plaintiff has consented to the motion to remand the case, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 13) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
