Jordan v. McNemar, 5:18-cv-00143-FDW. (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20200317b88
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 14, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2020
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's filing of a "Motion to Hosted A Settlement Conference." [Doc. 45]. Plaintiff has moved for a settlement conference with the Defendant FNU McNemar. [Doc. 45]. The Court construed Plaintiff's motion as a request for this Court to hold a judicial settlement conference pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.3(d)(1) and instructed Defendant McNemar to notify the Court within 10 days as to whether he consent
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's filing of a "Motion to Hosted A Settlement Conference." [Doc. 45]. Plaintiff has moved for a settlement conference with the Defendant FNU McNemar. [Doc. 45]. The Court construed Plaintiff's motion as a request for this Court to hold a judicial settlement conference pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.3(d)(1) and instructed Defendant McNemar to notify the Court within 10 days as to whether he consents..
More
ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's filing of a "Motion to Hosted A Settlement Conference." [Doc. 45].
Plaintiff has moved for a settlement conference with the Defendant FNU McNemar. [Doc. 45]. The Court construed Plaintiff's motion as a request for this Court to hold a judicial settlement conference pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.3(d)(1) and instructed Defendant McNemar to notify the Court within 10 days as to whether he consents to a judicial settlement conference in this matter. [Doc. 47]. Defendant McNemar has responded, declining a judicial settlement conference, noting that "given the questions of law and lack of genuine issues of material fact, the parties would likely reach an impasse at a settlement conference." [Doc. 48 at 2]. The Court, therefore, will deny Plaintiff's motion.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion [Doc. 45] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
