Anders v. Saul, 1:19-CV-00278-FDW. (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20200320928
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2020
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Defendant's Consent Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), Plaintiff's consent to that motion, and the entire record in this case, the motion (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that the final decision of the Commissioner is reversed and that this matter is hereby remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of section 205
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Defendant's Consent Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), Plaintiff's consent to that motion, and the entire record in this case, the motion (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that the final decision of the Commissioner is reversed and that this matter is hereby remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of section 205(..
More
ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief District Judge.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the Defendant's Consent Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff's consent to that motion, and the entire record in this case, the motion (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that the final decision of the Commissioner is reversed and that this matter is hereby remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
