ORDER

MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Government's Motion to Place Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in Abeyance, (Doc. No. 19).

Petitioner was convicted in the underlying criminal case of offenses including possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) based on the offense of murder in aid of racketeering. He filed his pro se § 2255 Motion to Vacate in June 2016, arguing that Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015), applies to 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Petitioner was subsequently appointed counsel. (Doc. No. 4). This matter was stayed for several years pending the issuance of Beckles v. United States, No. 15-8544, (Doc. No. 8), then United States v. Ali, No. 15-4433 and United States v. Simms, No. 15-4640, (Doc. No. 10), and United States v. Davis, 18-431, (Doc. No. 12). Most recently, the case was stayed pending the United States Supreme Court's consideration of Walker v. United States, No. 19-373 which presented the issue of whether an offense that can be committed with mens rea of recklessness can qualify as a "violent felony" under the Armed Career Criminal Act. (Doc. No. 17).

The Government presently seeks further stay pursuant to Borden v. United States, 19-5410 now that the Supreme Court has dismissed Walker due to Mr. Walker's passing. Borden presents substantially the same question as Walker and counsel for Petitioner does not object.

The Government's Motion to Place Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in Abeyance, (Doc. No. 19), is GRANTED. The Government shall have 45 days after the United States Supreme Court issues its decision in Borden within which to file its response.

IT IS SO ORDERED.