Filed: Feb. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2013
Summary: PER CURIAM. [ 1] Christi Pankonin appeals a district court order denying a Rule 60, N.D.R.Civ.P., motion for relief from summary judgment. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) (the district court did not abuse its discretion). [ 2] Assuming, without deciding, that the district court properly entered its subsequent order on request for sanctions, that order was not appealed, so it is not before us, and we do not decide it. [ 3] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, DA
Summary: PER CURIAM. [ 1] Christi Pankonin appeals a district court order denying a Rule 60, N.D.R.Civ.P., motion for relief from summary judgment. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) (the district court did not abuse its discretion). [ 2] Assuming, without deciding, that the district court properly entered its subsequent order on request for sanctions, that order was not appealed, so it is not before us, and we do not decide it. [ 3] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, DAN..
More
PER CURIAM.
[¶ 1] Christi Pankonin appeals a district court order denying a Rule 60, N.D.R.Civ.P., motion for relief from summary judgment. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) (the district court did not abuse its discretion).
[¶ 2] Assuming, without deciding, that the district court properly entered its subsequent order on request for sanctions, that order was not appealed, so it is not before us, and we do not decide it.
[¶ 3] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, JJ., and WILLIAM F. HODNY, S.J., concur.
[¶ 4] The Honorable WILLIAM F. HODNY, Surrogate Judge, sitting in place of KAPSNER, J., disqualified.
