MATTER OF MANGELSEN, 884 N.W.2d 748 (2016)
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota
Number: inndco20160915721
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 15, 2016
Summary: PER CURIAM . [ 1] Sandy Lee Mangelsen appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. Mangelsen argues the district court's order was not supported by clear and convincing evidence. Because the findings of fact were not clearly erroneous, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, LISA FAIR McEVERS, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ.,
Summary: PER CURIAM . [ 1] Sandy Lee Mangelsen appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. Mangelsen argues the district court's order was not supported by clear and convincing evidence. Because the findings of fact were not clearly erroneous, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, LISA FAIR McEVERS, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ., ..
More
PER CURIAM.
[¶ 1] Sandy Lee Mangelsen appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. Mangelsen argues the district court's order was not supported by clear and convincing evidence. Because the findings of fact were not clearly erroneous, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, LISA FAIR McEVERS, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
