U.S. v. McDERMOTT, 1:15-cr-043. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. North Dakota
Number: infdco20160412b44
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2016
Summary: ORDER CHARLES S. MILLER, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Defendant was conditionally released pending final disposition of this matter. One of defendant's release conditions was that he was to submit to electronic monitoring. On April 11, 2016, the Pretrial Services Office contacted to the court to recommend that defendant's conditions of release be modified to no longer require electronic monitoring. It reports that defendant's performance while on release has been exemplary. It further advises
Summary: ORDER CHARLES S. MILLER, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Defendant was conditionally released pending final disposition of this matter. One of defendant's release conditions was that he was to submit to electronic monitoring. On April 11, 2016, the Pretrial Services Office contacted to the court to recommend that defendant's conditions of release be modified to no longer require electronic monitoring. It reports that defendant's performance while on release has been exemplary. It further advises t..
More
ORDER
CHARLES S. MILLER, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
Defendant was conditionally released pending final disposition of this matter. One of defendant's release conditions was that he was to submit to electronic monitoring.
On April 11, 2016, the Pretrial Services Office contacted to the court to recommend that defendant's conditions of release be modified to no longer require electronic monitoring. It reports that defendant's performance while on release has been exemplary. It further advises that the Government has no objection to its recommendation.
There being no objection from the Government, the court shall modify defendant's release conditions as recommended by the Pretrial Services Office. Accordingly, the court strikes the condition of release requiring electronic monitoring of defendant. All other conditions of release previously imposed upon defendant by the court remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
