Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

OVERCASH v. JONES CONTRACTORS, INC., 4:15-cv-056. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. North Dakota Number: infdco20161205b80 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2016
Summary: ORDER CHARLES S. MILLER, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . The Defendants have filed objections to deposition testimony Plaintiff has indicated she will present at trial. (Docket No. 94). Specifically, Defendants object to the deposition testimony from Tracey Jones, Colton Lantz, and Dalton Lantz. As of this time, Plaintiff has not filed copies of the transcripts from those depositions with the court, rendering the court unable to consider whether to allow the objected testimony. The court ORDERS
More

ORDER

The Defendants have filed objections to deposition testimony Plaintiff has indicated she will present at trial. (Docket No. 94). Specifically, Defendants object to the deposition testimony from Tracey Jones, Colton Lantz, and Dalton Lantz. As of this time, Plaintiff has not filed copies of the transcripts from those depositions with the court, rendering the court unable to consider whether to allow the objected testimony. The court ORDERS either party intending to offer testimony by way of deposition to electronically file a transcript of that deposition forthwith. If the parties have been unable to resolve the dispute concerning the above-mentioned deposition testimonies, the court will take up the objections either before trial on Monday or during a recess on Monday morning.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer