SMITH v. HARTMAN WALSH PAINTING COMPANY, 1:15-cv-94. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. North Dakota
Number: infdco20161208c24
Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RALPH R. ERICKSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the court has received a Report and Recommendation from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge. 1 The Report and Recommendation recommends that Defendant Hartman Walsh Painting Company's ("Hartman") motion for injunctive relief 2 be denied and that Defendant Hartman's motion to strike 3 also be denied. No objections have been filed and the time for doing so
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RALPH R. ERICKSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the court has received a Report and Recommendation from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge. 1 The Report and Recommendation recommends that Defendant Hartman Walsh Painting Company's ("Hartman") motion for injunctive relief 2 be denied and that Defendant Hartman's motion to strike 3 also be denied. No objections have been filed and the time for doing so h..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RALPH R. ERICKSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has received a Report and Recommendation from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge.1 The Report and Recommendation recommends that Defendant Hartman Walsh Painting Company's ("Hartman") motion for injunctive relief2 be denied and that Defendant Hartman's motion to strike3 also be denied. No objections have been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
After reviewing the record and the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the court finds the magistrate judge's analysis of the motions and recommendations for disposition are appropriate. Accordingly, the court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Defendant Hartman's motion for injunctive relief and motion to strike are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Doc. #134.
2. Doc. #108.
3. Doc. #125.
Source: Leagle
