Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Riverdale High Lodge, 1:18-mc-003. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. North Dakota
Number: infdco20180626c72
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHARLES S. MILLER, JR. , Magistrate Judge . On April 25, 2018, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") filed an "Application for an Order to Show Cause Why Administrative Subpoena Should not Be Enforced." Upon review and consideration of the EEOC's application and supporting memorandum, the court ordered respondent to show cause why it should not be required to comply with Amended Subpoena No. CHMN-A18-5 issued by the EEOC. On June 1, 2018, respondent filed a response to
Summary: ORDER CHARLES S. MILLER, JR. , Magistrate Judge . On April 25, 2018, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") filed an "Application for an Order to Show Cause Why Administrative Subpoena Should not Be Enforced." Upon review and consideration of the EEOC's application and supporting memorandum, the court ordered respondent to show cause why it should not be required to comply with Amended Subpoena No. CHMN-A18-5 issued by the EEOC. On June 1, 2018, respondent filed a response to ..
More
ORDER
CHARLES S. MILLER, JR., Magistrate Judge.
On April 25, 2018, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") filed an "Application for an Order to Show Cause Why Administrative Subpoena Should not Be Enforced." Upon review and consideration of the EEOC's application and supporting memorandum, the court ordered respondent to show cause why it should not be required to comply with Amended Subpoena No. CHMN-A18-5 issued by the EEOC.
On June 1, 2018, respondent filed a response to the court's order to show cause, advising that it would produce the requested documents to the best of its ability by June 15, 2018.
If it has not already done so, respondent shall produce the requested documents by July 6, 2018. This matter shall be deemed closed and the EEOC's application (Doc. No. 1) shall be administratively termed. Should the EEOC take further issue with respondent's response to its subpoena(s), it may file an application for whatever relief its believes it is entitled.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
