Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lacey v. Nabors Completion & Production Services, 1:18-cv-244. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. North Dakota Number: infdco20190219c51 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2019
Summary: MODIFIED ORDER CHARLES S. MILLER, JR. , Magistrate Judge . On January 29, 2019, the court held a status conference in the above captioned matter. In defendants' answer, filed on January 16, 2019, defendants allege that plaintiff's claims are discharged and enjoined as a result of the bankruptcy case filed by defendants on July 20, 2016, in the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. In the alternative, defendants allege that plaintiff's claims are subject to mandatory arbitrati
More

MODIFIED ORDER

On January 29, 2019, the court held a status conference in the above captioned matter. In defendants' answer, filed on January 16, 2019, defendants allege that plaintiff's claims are discharged and enjoined as a result of the bankruptcy case filed by defendants on July 20, 2016, in the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. In the alternative, defendants allege that plaintiff's claims are subject to mandatory arbitration. The court has concluded that these two issues should be resolved sooner rather than later. Therefore, the court ORDERS:

1. Defendants shall file a motion to dismiss and supporting brief regarding the issue of discharge as a result of the bankruptcy proceedings and the issue of whether the plaintiff's claims are the subject of mandatory arbitration, no later than February 28, 2019. Defendants' motion to dismiss may be filed before the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas or before this court in the District of North Dakota. 2. Plaintiffs shall file their response no later than March 30, 2019, or if filed in the Southern District of Texas as otherwise provided for by the Southern District of Texas' Bankruptcy rules. 3. Defendants may file a reply no later than April 10, 2019, or if filed in the Southern District of Texas as otherwise provided for by the Southern District of Texas' Bankruptcy rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer