Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Garcia-Ramirez, 1:19-mj-183 (2019)

Court: District Court, D. North Dakota Number: infdco20190523c63 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 22, 2019
Latest Update: May 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER CLARE R. HOCHHALTER , Magistrate Judge . The Court had previously scheduled a detention hearing for defendant on May 22, 2019, at 3:30 p.m. Now before the Court is defendant's motion to continue the hearing. Defendant requests to postpone the hearing until such time that he is ready to proceed. He acknowledges that the continuance may extend past the five-day period specified in 18 U.S.C. 3142(f)(2) and that he will remain in custody until the hearing is rescheduled. Attached to the
More

ORDER

The Court had previously scheduled a detention hearing for defendant on May 22, 2019, at 3:30 p.m. Now before the Court is defendant's motion to continue the hearing. Defendant requests to postpone the hearing until such time that he is ready to proceed. He acknowledges that the continuance may extend past the five-day period specified in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2) and that he will remain in custody until the hearing is rescheduled. Attached to the motion is defendant's signed consent to continue the hearing.

For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS defendant's motion (Doc. No. 10). The detention hearing scheduled for May 22, 2019, at 3:30 p.m. is cancelled. Pending further order of the Court, defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General or designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. Defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a Court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with court proceedings. The Court shall reschedule the detention hearing upon request by defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer