Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN THE MATTER OF PORTER, A16-8029. (2016)

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska Number: inbco20160928850 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER THOMAS L. SALADINO , Bankruptcy Judge . This matter is before the court on the debtor-plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Fil. No. 5). Keith M. Buzzard represents the debtor-plaintiff. No appearance has been made for the defendant. Evidence and a brief were filed and, pursuant to the court's authority under Nebraska Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7056-1, the motion was taken under advisement without oral arguments. The motion is denied. This adversary proceeding was filed to avoi
More

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the debtor-plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Fil. No. 5). Keith M. Buzzard represents the debtor-plaintiff. No appearance has been made for the defendant. Evidence and a brief were filed and, pursuant to the court's authority under Nebraska Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7056-1, the motion was taken under advisement without oral arguments.

The motion is denied.

This adversary proceeding was filed to avoid a junior lien on the debtor's real property. "Lien avoidance is a significant alteration of a creditor's legal rights. Therefore, notice and opportunity to be heard are of paramount importance." In re Collins, Case No. BK16-40070, at *1 (Bankr. D. Neb. Mar. 8, 2016).

In the Collins order, the court painstakingly explained how to achieve proper service. That explanation bears repeating here, because the plaintiff in this case has named a local bank as a defendant but has failed to follow the appropriate procedures under the federal rules for accomplishing proper service on such an institution:

The overarching goal . . . is to ensure that the court can exercise jurisdiction over an entity — whether it has subjected itself to the jurisdiction of the court by filing a proof of claim, or whether jurisdiction has been achieved through proper service of process. . . . . . . Service of process is governed by Bankruptcy Rule 7004 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Here, it appears that service was attempted to be made by mailing the [summons and complaint] . . . to the bank name at a street address, without mention of an individual or officer or agent at that address. . . . The mailing to a street address without naming an officer or agent is [] insufficient. There are a number of ways under the federal rules to serve a creditor . . . — but each takes a bit of homework. Does the creditor have a registered agent in Nebraska? A quick call to the Secretary of State would reveal that answer, and if so, service on the registered agent is guaranteed to be sufficient. Bankruptcy Rule 7004(b)(3) authorizes service by first class mail "[u]pon a domestic or foreign corporation or upon a partnership or other unincorporated association, by mailing a copy of the summons and complaint to the attention of an officer, a managing or general agent, or to any other agent . . . ." Here, service would have been proper at a street address of the bank if it were directed to a named officer or agent at that address. There are even special rules for service of process on an insured depository institution pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7004(h). . . . [I]f [the defendant] qualifies as an insured depository institution, . . . service must be directed to a specific person who is an officer of the institution, as required by the rule. Achieving proper service of process takes time and effort. To get it right, one needs to know the proper legal name of the entity, where it is organized, its registered address, and its registered agent or officer names and addresses.

Id. at *2-3.

IT IS ORDERED: Because the debtor-plaintiff has not properly served the defendant, the motion for summary judgment (Fil. No. 5) is denied.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer