PATTERSON v. CITY OF OMAHA, 8:11CV128. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20120216c74
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2012
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court after defendants were ordered to file a response to plaintiff's motion explaining why they have not responded to plaintiff's requests for discovery on or before February 10, 2012 (Filing No. 28 ). The Court notes no response has been filed. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that defendants shall show cause, in writing, on or before March 1, 2012, why judgment of liability should not be entered against them. Failure to do so
Summary: ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court after defendants were ordered to file a response to plaintiff's motion explaining why they have not responded to plaintiff's requests for discovery on or before February 10, 2012 (Filing No. 28 ). The Court notes no response has been filed. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that defendants shall show cause, in writing, on or before March 1, 2012, why judgment of liability should not be entered against them. Failure to do so ..
More
ORDER
LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court after defendants were ordered to file a response to plaintiff's motion explaining why they have not responded to plaintiff's requests for discovery on or before February 10, 2012 (Filing No. 28). The Court notes no response has been filed. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that defendants shall show cause, in writing, on or before March 1, 2012, why judgment of liability should not be entered against them. Failure to do so will result in a trial on the amount of damages only.
Source: Leagle
