U.S. v. FINCH, 8:11CR240. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20120217c39
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2012
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [21] due to the resolution of a co-defendant's case. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for February 28, 2012 is continued to April 24, 2012. 2. Defendant is ordered to file a waiver of speedy trial as soon as practicable 3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court f
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [21] due to the resolution of a co-defendant's case. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for February 28, 2012 is continued to April 24, 2012. 2. Defendant is ordered to file a waiver of speedy trial as soon as practicable 3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court fi..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [21] due to the resolution of a co-defendant's case. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial now set for February 28, 2012 is continued to April 24, 2012.
2. Defendant is ordered to file a waiver of speedy trial as soon as practicable
3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between February 28, 2012 and April 24, 2012, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
