ALPER v. GALLUP, INC., 8:11CV254. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20120312787
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 08, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, District Judge. This matter is before the court on several discovery-related Motions. (Filing Nos. 22 , 30 , 34 , and 38 .) Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment (filing no. 28 ), Brief in Support (filing no. 51 ), and Index of Evidence (filing no. 50 ) on February 15, 2012. Plaintiff thereafter filed his 53-page Response (filing no. 57 ) and 165-page Index of Evidence (filing no. 56 ). The court has carefully reviewed these document
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, District Judge. This matter is before the court on several discovery-related Motions. (Filing Nos. 22 , 30 , 34 , and 38 .) Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment (filing no. 28 ), Brief in Support (filing no. 51 ), and Index of Evidence (filing no. 50 ) on February 15, 2012. Plaintiff thereafter filed his 53-page Response (filing no. 57 ) and 165-page Index of Evidence (filing no. 56 ). The court has carefully reviewed these documents..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on several discovery-related Motions. (Filing Nos. 22, 30, 34, and 38.) Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment (filing no. 28), Brief in Support (filing no. 51), and Index of Evidence (filing no. 50) on February 15, 2012. Plaintiff thereafter filed his 53-page Response (filing no. 57) and 165-page Index of Evidence (filing no. 56). The court has carefully reviewed these documents. Neither party asserts that any of the requested discovery impacts or otherwise affects the pending Motion for Summary Judgment or Response. As such, they are denied as moot.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The various discovery-related Motions filed by the parties (filing nos. 22, 30, 34, and 38) are denied without prejudice as moot.
Source: Leagle
