U.S. v. LAROSE, 8:11CR407. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20120321b18
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Leslie A. LaRose (LaRose) (Filing No. 17). LaRose seeks a continuance of the trial of this matter which is scheduled for March 26, 2012. LaRose's counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1. LaRose's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 17) is granted. 2. Trial of this matter is re
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Leslie A. LaRose (LaRose) (Filing No. 17). LaRose seeks a continuance of the trial of this matter which is scheduled for March 26, 2012. LaRose's counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1. LaRose's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 17) is granted. 2. Trial of this matter is re-..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Leslie A. LaRose (LaRose) (Filing No. 17). LaRose seeks a continuance of the trial of this matter which is scheduled for March 26, 2012. LaRose's counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. LaRose's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 17) is granted.
2. Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for May 21, 2012, before Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between March 20, 2012, and May 21, 2012, be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
