PETER KIEWIT SONS', INC. v. WALL STREET EQUITY GROUP, INC., 8:10CV365. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20120619a58
Filed: Jun. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 16, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge. The defendant's motion to reconsider, (filing no. 269), and supporting brief, (filing no. 270), raise no new issues for the court's consideration. In large part, the defense arguments focus of the court's findings of fact; specifically, the credibility of the witnesses and the defendants' level of culpability in manipulating or stalling the discovery processes, and destroying potential sources of discovery. The evidentiary record on the M
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge. The defendant's motion to reconsider, (filing no. 269), and supporting brief, (filing no. 270), raise no new issues for the court's consideration. In large part, the defense arguments focus of the court's findings of fact; specifically, the credibility of the witnesses and the defendants' level of culpability in manipulating or stalling the discovery processes, and destroying potential sources of discovery. The evidentiary record on the Mo..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
The defendant's motion to reconsider, (filing no. 269), and supporting brief, (filing no. 270), raise no new issues for the court's consideration. In large part, the defense arguments focus of the court's findings of fact; specifically, the credibility of the witnesses and the defendants' level of culpability in manipulating or stalling the discovery processes, and destroying potential sources of discovery. The evidentiary record on the Motion for Issuance of Subpoena (Filing No. 87), Motion to Compel (Filing No. 104), Motion for Sanctions (Filing No. 135), and Motion for Protective Order (Filing No. 158) is closed. The court will not revisit its findings of fact and conclusions of law on matters already addressed and decided.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendants' motion for reconsideration, (filing no. 269), is denied.
2) Defendants' deadline for responding to plaintiff's motion for attorney fees, (filing no. 265), remains June 18, 2012.
Source: Leagle
